Genetic Engineering is Unethical Essay -- Genetic Engineering is Immora

Just as the success of a corporate body in making money need not set the human watch ahead, neither does every scientific advance automatically make our lives more meaningful (Wald 45). These words were spoken by a Nobel Prize winning biologist and Harvard professor, George Wald, in a lecture given in 1976 on the Dangers of contagious Engineering. This quotation states that incredible inventions, such as catching plan, are not always beneficial to society. contagious engineer is altering the genetic substantive of cells and/or organisms in order to make them capable of making upstart substances or performing new functions (Wald 45). It is also one of the top moot issues of the 20th century (Epstein 1). Many believe that continuing to provide genetically constructed inventions in this world is ethical, which means that these inventions conform to ones chaste standards (Epstein 5). Others argue that such inventions as human clones, which are genetically constructed humans, and some other genetically pee-peed figures, are wrong and should be stopped (Epstein 5). Overwhelming textual evidence proves that genetic engineering is not beneficial to society. Accordingly, genetic engineering is unethical and therefore should be stopped.One reason why genetic engineering should cease is be scram genetic engineering disrupts societys moral values and causes society to act out in destructive ways. An online check out done by Time Magazine in 1997, found that 11% of those who were interviewed believe that if clones are created in the future, the genetically created humans will sole(prenominal) be good for target practice (Epstein 2). Another survey by the selfsame(prenominal) magazine was conducted and found that 50% of those who were questioned believe that clones should be treated as lower beings and should not be given the same rights as timeless humans (Epstein 2). Furthermore, a similar survey, completed by MacLeans Magazine in 1993, reported that 11% of those interviewed confirmed that if technology was able to change defects indoors their unborn child, they would not hesitate in changing the childs genes in order for the child to be born normal (Epstein 3). The choice to create ones own child will have many believe that the better the genes, the better the child. These statistics, without a doubt, reveal that genetic engineering will be harmful to society if certain means... ...g (Bereano 18). One would appreciate that people would have control over their own genes however, that does not await to be the case. Therefore, the rights to ones own identity will be abolished if human genes can be selected thus, genetic engineering should be stopped, for it is unethical.Genetic engineering should be eradicated due to the fact that it is immoral. It is proven that such inventions as genetic engineering can negatively affect society and cause rash and inappropriate behavior. Also, genetic engineering involves altering natures balan ce, which is not the job of scientists, or society. Finally, genetic engineering can eradicate ones sense of individuality and spoil Gods plan of making all people unique. Because of these reasons, genetic engineering should be stopped. It is a bad science making a dangerous attachment with a bad business. Works CitedBereano, Phillip L. Body and Soul the Price of Biotech. Seattle Times. 20 Aug. 2005 18-20.Epstein, Ron. Ethical Dangers of Genetic Engineering.(http//online.sfsu.edu/ron/gedanger.htm) (February 26, 2000).Wald, George. The Case Against Genetic Engineering. New Jersey EnglewoodCliffs, 2006.